Report: Penguins shop Rust and Rakell after four losses and 21 goals against
Our take Selling forwards won't fix 21 goals against
Our Avalanche vs Penguins prediction: the Colorado Avalanche beat the Pittsburgh Penguins at Ball Arena, overtime and shootout included, and our main score is 4:2. Last season Colorado took 73.8% of the points with a goal difference of +1.21 a game; Pittsburgh took 59.8% and have now lost four of their last five. Mackenzie Blackwood and Arturs Silovs are the expected goalies, neither confirmed yet.
| Match | Colorado Avalanche vs Pittsburgh Penguins |
|---|---|
| Competition | NHL · Regular season |
| Kick-off | 17 OCT · 02:00 UK |
| Venue | Ball Arena, Denver |
| Our pick | Colorado win · incl. OT · 1.46 · bet |
| Our estimate | 66–68% |
| Predicted score | 4:2 |
| Main reason | Last season Colorado were one of the best teams in the league by goal difference, +1.21 a game with 73.8% of the points, while Pittsburgh took 59.8%. |
Colorado 2-3 in their last 5. Pittsburgh 1-4.
| Attack & defence | COL | PIT |
|---|---|---|
| Wins and losses. | 4-2-1 | 3-3-1 |
| Points % | 64.3% | 50.0% |
| Goal difference per game | +1.29 | +0.43 |
| Goals scored per game, overtime included. | 4.43 | 3.57 |
| Goals allowed per game, overtime included. | 3.14 | 3.14 |
| Shots on goal per game. | 30.6 | 28.4 |
| Shots against | 25.1 | 28.3 |
| Special teams | COL | PIT |
|---|---|---|
| Share of power plays (a player advantage) that end with a goal. | 20.0% | 16.7% |
| Share of opponents’ power plays stopped without conceding. | 82.4% | 89.5% |
| Last season | COL | PIT |
|---|---|---|
| Wins and losses. | 55-16-11 | 41-25-16 |
| Points % | 73.8% | 59.8% |
| Goal difference per game | +1.21 | +0.30 |
| Shots on goal per game. | 33.7 | 28.6 |
| Shots against | 26.1 | 27.4 |
| Share of power plays (a player advantage) that end with a goal. | 17.1% | 24.1% |
| Share of opponents’ power plays stopped without conceding. | 84.6% | 81.4% |
NHL 2026-27 so far, and 2025-26 · NHL stats
Blackwood and Silovs expected; neither is confirmed yet.
Our take Selling forwards won't fix 21 goals against
Our take Dallas need goals tonight, not revenge
The one outside model we found picks Colorado.
| Source | Pick | Versus us |
|---|---|---|
| DRatings | Colorado 68.2%, projected 3.96 to 2.65 | Same side |
Colorado's shot volume against a goalie at .883 over three seasons.
4:2 to Colorado is our main score. Colorado outshoot opponents 30.6 to 25.1 a game this season, and Silovs has saved .883 of shots over three seasons. Pittsburgh had the better power play of the two last season, 24.1% against 17.1%, so we expect them to score with the extra man at least once. 3:2 to Colorado after overtime is the alternative if a third game in four nights slows the home side. Any Colorado win, in regulation, overtime or a shootout, wins this bet; any Pittsburgh win loses it.
Colorado win · incl. OT: why this pick wins
Last season Colorado were one of the best teams in the league by goal difference, +1.21 a game with 73.8% of the points, while Pittsburgh took 59.8%. Pittsburgh have lost four of their last five and come to Denver after a 3:5 defeat in Chicago. Colorado outshoot opponents 30.6 to 25.1 a game this season, and Silovs has saved .883 over three seasons. With overtime and the shootout included, any Colorado win counts, which matters after two 3:2 games against Dallas this week.
What would change our mind A confirmed Colorado starter other than Mackenzie Blackwood or Scott Wedgewood would make us drop this bet.
| Market | Odds | Break-even |
|---|---|---|
| Colorado win · incl. OT | 1.46 | 68.5% |
| Pittsburgh win · incl. OT | 2.75 | 36.4% |
| Colorado win in 60 min | 1.73 | 57.8% |
| Draw in 60 min | 4.57 | 21.9% |
| Pittsburgh win in 60 min | 3.80 | 26.3% |
| Pittsburgh +1.5 | 1.77 | 56.5% |
Odds snapshot 16 OCT 06:33 · no bookmaker names
Why this could go wrong.
Bet Colorado win · incl. OT at 1.46, a single on tonight's NHL card.
We expect this result and play it, as a single or as one leg of a double. It is logged in the tracker at the published odds.
We start from the market, then check a statistical model, named previews and our own scenario test against everything that moves the result: lineups, rest, motivation, style and team news. We publish when at least three of the four agree and the pick wins in the main scorelines. A warning sign, such as a back-up goalie or tired legs, moves us to a safer market or leaves the match as analysis only.
No. The pick, odds and time are locked when published. Updates go into the log above.