Ottawa are 7-1 with Ullmark in goal. He left on a routine save, and Ersson is 0-2
Our take Ottawa's 7-3 start rests on one goalie
Our Maple Leafs vs Sharks prediction: San Jose +1.5 goals, with a main score of 4:3 to Toronto. The Toronto Maple Leafs are 3-4-2, play without John Tavares and Chris Tanev, and have Anthony Stolarz as the expected goalie. The San Jose Sharks are 4-3-1 and have gone past regulation in three of their last five games. The line gives Toronto about 56%, and we expect a close, open game decided by one goal, so our pick is San Jose +1.5, as analysis only.
| Match | Toronto Maple Leafs vs San Jose Sharks |
|---|---|
| Competition | NHL · Regular season |
| Kick-off | 20 OCT · 00:30 UK |
| Venue | Scotiabank Arena, Toronto |
| Our pick | San Jose +1.5 · 1.49 · analysis only |
| Our estimate | 62–65% |
| Predicted score | 4:3 |
| Main reason | Toronto are favourites at home, but without Tavares and Tanev and with one win in five they are not dominant. |
Toronto 1-4 in their last 5. San Jose 2-3.
| Attack & defence | TOR | SJS |
|---|---|---|
| Wins and losses. | 3-4-2 | 4-3-1 |
| Points % | 44.4% | 56.3% |
| Goal difference per game | -0.33 | -0.88 |
| Goals scored per game, overtime included. | 3.22 | 2.75 |
| Goals allowed per game, overtime included. | 3.56 | 3.63 |
| Shots on goal per game. | 28.0 | 27.6 |
| Shots against | 29.3 | 27.5 |
| Special teams | TOR | SJS |
|---|---|---|
| Share of power plays (a player advantage) that end with a goal. | 26.7% | 23.1% |
| Share of opponents’ power plays stopped without conceding. | 96.4% | 80.8% |
| Last season | TOR | SJS |
|---|---|---|
| Wins and losses. | 32-36-14 | 39-35-8 |
| Points % | 47.6% | 52.4% |
| Goal difference per game | -0.56 | -0.50 |
| Shots on goal per game. | 26.3 | 25.8 |
| Shots against | 32.4 | 29.6 |
| Share of power plays (a player advantage) that end with a goal. | 21.3% | 21.2% |
| Share of opponents’ power plays stopped without conceding. | 81.2% | 76.4% |
NHL 2026-27, 9 and 8 games; 2025-26 regular season · NHL stats
Both teams are expected to change goalies from Saturday.
Our take Ottawa's 7-3 start rests on one goalie
Both models we found see Toronto by less than a goal.
| Source | Pick | Versus us |
|---|---|---|
| DRatings | Toronto 54.2%, projected 3.56 to 3.10 | Other side |
| Dimers | Toronto 56.8% | Other side |
Two shaky defences, one goal in it.
4:3 to Toronto is our main score: the home side's power play (26.7%) and penalty kill (96.4%) give them the upper hand on special teams, but neither goalie has been reliable enough to keep the score low. 2:3 to San Jose after overtime or a shootout is the alternative: the Sharks have taken three of their last five games past regulation, and Nedeljkovic is in better form than either Toronto goalie. San Jose +1.5 loses only to a Toronto win by two goals or more, and an empty-net goal at the end is the main way that happens.
San Jose +1.5: why this pick wins
Toronto are favourites at home, but without Tavares and Tanev and with one win in five they are not dominant. San Jose keep their games close: three of the last five went past regulation. Both teams were below average last season, and both goalies tonight are the second choice by starts. We expect a one-goal Toronto win, but with both results possible we are not sure enough to bet.
What would change our mind Askarov in the San Jose goal instead of Nedeljkovic, after his .848 in five starts, would make us less sure of a close game.
| Market | Odds | Break-even |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto win · incl. OT | 1.71 | 58.5% |
| San Jose win · incl. OT | 2.18 | 45.9% |
| Toronto win in 60 min | 2.14 | 46.7% |
| Draw in 60 min | 4.22 | 23.7% |
| San Jose win in 60 min | 2.80 | 35.7% |
| San Jose +1.5 | 1.49 | 67.1% |
| Toronto −1.5 | 2.64 | 37.9% |
| Over 6.5 goals | 1.90 | 52.6% |
| Under 6.5 goals | 1.89 | 52.9% |
Odds snapshot 19 OCT 05:25 · no bookmaker names
Why our pick could go wrong.
Our pick: San Jose +1.5 at 1.49 · analysis only. We expect 4:3; the game looks too even for a bet on either side.
Analysis only, no bet: this match doesn’t count towards ROI.
Our full analysis of the match and the result we expect, without a bet.
We start from the market, then check a statistical model, named previews and our own scenario test against everything that moves the result: lineups, rest, motivation, style and team news. We publish when at least three of the four agree and the pick wins in the main scorelines. A warning sign, such as a back-up goalie or tired legs, moves us to a safer market or leaves the match as analysis only.
No. The pick, odds and time are locked when published. Updates go into the log above.